Abstrakti
This study addresses the implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) in higher education in North Macedonia. IBL is a learner-centred approach based on utilizing students’ questions to facilitate learning and is suitable for cultivating critical thinking skills among students. Modern teaching methodologies advocate for its broader classroom application, not only in language instruction but also across various disciplines. The findings highlighted several benefits associated with the implementation of IBL in EFL instruction. These include the development of communication skills, fostering collaboration among students, promoting critical thinking abilities, and facilitating active learning. These outcomes align with the broader goals of modern teaching methodologies, which emphasize learner-centred approaches and the cultivation of essential skills beyond language acquisition. Overall, the results suggest that integrating IBL into EFL instruction at SEEU has the potential to enhance the educational experience for both teachers and students. By fostering a more engaging and interactive learning environment, IBL can contribute to the achievement of educational goals while equipping students with essential skills for success in their academic and professional endeavours.
Referencat
- Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
- Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.
- Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 88(3), 384-400.
- Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00025-7
- Donoghue, G. and Hattie, J. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of Ten Learning Techniques. In: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, Vol.6. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.581216
- Erdogan, S. T., Stuessy, C. L., & Maday, T. R. (2017). The challenges and opportunities of implementing inquiry-based learning in higher education: A systematic review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 487-500.
- Herreid, C. F. (1994). Case studies in science—a novel method of science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(4), 221-229.
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:edpr.0000034022.16470.f3
- Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
- Prince, M., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
- Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38 homas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Komente
Ende nuk ka komente. Pyetjet dhe vërejtjet për artikullin janë të mirëpritura.